Human Creativity as the Optimal Navigation Strategy in High-Dimensional Possibility Spaces

Fibers on X

What the data actually shows: Standard models of human creativity as the optimal navigation strategy in high-dimensional possibility spaces predict outcomes that contradict observed data across multiple scales of reality.
Why this is necessary: Without human creativity as the optimal navigation strategy in high-dimensional possibility spaces, the system would either collapse into trivial simplicity or fragment into incoherent noise.
What current approaches miss: The information-polarity framework was never applied at this scale, leaving the field with fragmented and often contradictory explanations.
If this is right: Enables practical applications in AI alignment, institutional design, and personal transformation by showing how to intentionally shift along the polarity spectrum.

Documented theorem joins

Join table only. No invented bijection.

Idea Series on X — Introduction · Index · Atlas

Outside instrument

Stake a prior. Name the disagreement. Not a theorem.

Outside the corpus

creativity · play / exploration. A paper can support a concept. It cannot support a necessity claim. Art.59 remains unproved by every card below.

Support · living source

Tight papers that bear on concepts inside Art.59. A DOI is not a join.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2, 71.
Play/exploration as the only long-run escape from local optima.
Does not support the necessity claim
Open original
Gopnik, A. (2020). Childhood as a solution to explore–exploit tensions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190502.
Immature cognition as high-temperature search — play as infrastructure.
Does not support the necessity claim
Open original
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior. Psychol. Bull. 129, 475.
Creativity as constrained chance, not a polarity operator with a unique attractor.
Does not support the necessity claim
Open original

Counter-arguments · refusing pole

One domain counter per cluster, not a repeating method quartet. The mirror reads these as enough to refuse necessity.

Manheim, D. & Garrabrant, S. (2018). Categorizing variants of Goodhart's Law. arXiv:1803.04585.
When a measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure — over-optimization.
Does not support the necessity claim
Open original
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O. & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
Counter: adding more minds can add noise rather than holographic closure.
Does not support the necessity claim
Open original